18 June 2013
Wednesday, 08 August 2012 15:15

Jihadist Michele Bachmann For Veep

Written by 

“Go bold, Mitt!” advised the Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol on the Republican choice for veep, which is expected to be announced within days.

I agree with Bill that a bland Mitt needs a vice-presidential pick who will spice up the ticket. Still, I hope that Mitt’s “boldness” doesn’t end up with, as Bill advises, “the Republican party’s intellectual leader,” Paul Ryan, or “its most gifted young politician,” Marco Rubio. These guys are mollycoddling wimps, not that much more exciting than Oregon’s bland Rob Portman or Minnesota’s equally bland Tim Pawlenty.

No, Mitt, you should surprise everyone – including London odds-makers who have reportedly put the chances of your picking her for veep at 100 to one — by selecting that red hot Christian jihadist: Michele Bachmann.

First, let us discard false analogies to that other one time hottie, Sarah Palin. Unlike Sarah, Michele is not ignorant. A graduate of Oral Robert University, she not only reads – sorry, Sarah – but helped research the 1987 New York Times best-seller (okay, I am exaggerating a bit) Christianity and the Constitution, which argues that not only was the United States founded as a Christian theocracy; it should become one again. Who can argue with that? (Okay, if you, like me, are not a mainstream Christian, this might be a problem. But still).

It’s not, however, just Michele’s intellect which impresses. My hometown of New York needs her clear American values — such as her position that English should be legislated as America's national language Of course! Why a week ago at a concert in Central Park, there on the Summerstage built with my taxpayer dollars, performers were singing in...I hesitate to tell you, so low has my city sunk...in Spanish!

Oh, a jolly time was had by the mostly Latino audience from Columbia and Puerto Rico. (I know this because when the d.j. asked where they were from, naming each place, they cheered for these other countries! Here, in America!) And when it started rained, instead of wrapping themselves up in the American flag while skewering political traitors, they sang and danced! Locos!

But I stray. Michele was born to parents who divorced — not, of course, because of her. So, what better person to champion family values? Especially after she and husband Marcus, in addition to having five children, provided foster care for 23 more. They also co-founded Bachman & Associates, which through 2010 reportedly received nearly $30,000 in payments from the state of Minnesota and another $137,000 from the feds.

True, some believe that those advocating cutting government spending should not be on the receiving end of government welfare. Picky, picky!

thers, of course, question why the Bachmanns adopted only teenage girls. To which I reply, why not?

Marcus’ therapeutic specialty includes converting gays to straight – an admittedly curious field given his marriage to such a hot Christian jihadist. Then again, maybe Marcus doesn’t care for straight men challenging his authority. This would reinforce your image, Mitt, not as a flip flopper but as a fierce manly man who stands by his beliefs no matter what in pushing for a constitutional amendment to outlaw gay marriage.

Apart from all this, Michele early this year applied for — and received - Swiss citizenship. She claimed she got her dual citizenship because Marcus’ parents are Swiss.

And as a former - if brief - Swiss citizen before all those news reports came out, as well as a former IRS tax attorney, who better, Mitt, to help you mind your Swiss bank accounts?

Last but not least is Michele’s Christian jihad against Huma Abedin, Secretary of State Clinton’s Muslim deputy chief of staff. Minnesota’s brave Congresswoman, together with four equally brave Republican Congressmen, charged that Abedin, (who is, curiously, married to Jewish ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner), is part of an international Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy (Sure, it makes little sense that Abedin, a woman, would conspire with a group that excludes women leaders. Details! Details!).

What’s more, Michele even got House Majority Leader Eric Cantor to defend her. He said that Michelle’s concern was not about promoting Christianity, but about “the security of the country.” And what better way to promote the security of our country than to promote Christian values? So, there you have it!

Yes, Michele’s Christian jihad recalls that of the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who similarly went after State Department traitors - though his villains of choice were suspected Commie sympathizers. And yes, McCarthy died an alcoholic, disgraced martyr “defending” our country, a choice Michele may not follow. But why be persnickity?

So listen to your base and “Go bold, Mitt!” After all, if your base is hell bent on political self-destruction, who, other than this bold Christian jihadist, could better move this along?

By Joe Hanania, Aslan Media Columnist
*Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore

Add comment

We only welcome and encourage constructive and respectful comments. Please avoid slurs, hate speech, general abuse against other participants, or any incitement of violence.
We reserve the right to delete your comments and block your participation with continued abuse.


Security code
Refresh

Comments   

 
0 # Lynn 2012-08-09 18:15
Michelle would NEVER condescend to being the VEEP for a shameless Mormon. In her view, Mormonism is probably on an equal footing with Islam as far as evil and unholy.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Bill 2012-08-09 18:45
I tremble at the thought that this nutjob could be so close to leading the country. Fortunately, there is no chance, because Romney lacks the courage to make any bold moves. It would be very smart of him to pick a woman. The lesson of Sarah Palin was not to stay away from bold picks, but rather to spend more than 30 seconds in vetting that pick. Of course, that's too subtle a point for Romney, so he will stick to some "safe male". Very 1930s, but for a guy, if he gets elected, who has the potential to make us think Herbert Hoover wasn't so bad, I guess 1930s style is to be expected.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Share This Column

About the Columnist: Joseph Hanania

Joseph Hanania has been a regular contributor to the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times. He has also written documentaries for CBS-TV and HBO, and taught screenwriting at UCLA Extension.

He is currently completing a non-fiction book about an orphaned Jewish merchant who rescued 1,350 Jews from the Holocaust by sailing them out of Europe on the Danube River.

Contact him via email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Follow Aslan Media